A few years ago, I would have scoffed at the idea of using artificial intelligence to create art.
As someone who values the emotional core of creativity, I couldn’t picture machines adding any real meaning to the process.
But as I watched the technology evolve—and after watching a video that explored how AI is shaping the work of today’s creatives—I realized I was looking at it all wrong.
AI wasn’t trying to replace me. It was offering to work with me.
Now, I see AI not as a shortcut or a gimmick, but as a fascinating tool that expands what’s possible in art.
And in this reflection, I want to share how my perspective changed, how AI has transformed my creative process, and why I believe it’s opening doors for a new kind of artist.
My journey with AI began more out of curiosity than intent. I was looking for visual inspiration for a new project, and someone mentioned a tool that could generate imagery from text prompts. Skeptical but intrigued, I typed in a phrase—something like “cityscape at dusk in watercolor style”—and within seconds, there it was. A surreal, luminous image that looked like it belonged in an art gallery.
At first, I felt guilty. Could I really call this mine?
I hadn’t drawn a single line. But as I started using the image as a base—tweaking it, adding layers, remixing elements—I realized I was creating.
The AI was just the starting point, like a collaborator offering suggestions I might not have considered.
It wasn’t replacing my creativity. It was reigniting it.
‍
Every artist gets stuck sometimes. Whether it’s the blank page, a stalled idea, or a project that’s just not coming together, creative blocks are part of the process.
This is where AI has become unexpectedly helpful. I now treat AI-generated visuals almost like thumbnails or mood boards.
If I have a concept in mind but can’t quite visualize it, I feed it into the AI and see what comes back. Sometimes it’s way off, sometimes eerily accurate—but almost always, it sparks something.
There are times when a single AI-generated image has unlocked an entire visual direction I hadn’t seen before. It’s like brainstorming with someone who never runs out of ideas and doesn’t judge the weird ones.
‍
One of the most exciting outcomes of AI is how it lowers the barrier to entry.
You don’t need years of training in color theory or mastery of Photoshop to start creating beautiful things. All you need is an idea and a prompt.
This kind of accessibility has huge implications. I’ve seen people with no formal art background create stunning pieces using just their imagination and a few lines of text.
They’re telling personal stories, exploring cultural heritage, designing logos, even illustrating children’s books—all with the help of AI.
It’s opening the door to voices that might never have had a platform before, and that’s something the art world desperately needs: more diversity, more perspectives, and more ways to participate.
‍
Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistant that helps improve grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style in text.
Notion is an all-in-one workspace and AI-powered note-taking app that helps users create, manage, and collaborate on various types of content.
Of course, working with AI isn’t all inspiration and easy wins. It comes with real ethical questions—ones that every creative needs to wrestle with.
Who owns the output of an AI-generated image?
If the algorithm was trained on millions of artworks, some from artists who never gave consent, what does that mean for copyright and originality? Is the prompt-writer the creator? Or is the AI company?
These aren’t just abstract questions. I’ve found myself rethinking how I credit work, how I talk about process, and what it means to make something “original.” For now, I’ve chosen to be transparent. If I use AI in a project, I say so. And I try to use it in a way that complements, rather than copies, the work of others.
The lines may stay blurry for a while, but what matters to me is keeping the dialogue open—and staying aware of the impact this tech can have, good or bad.
‍
Here’s the thing that AI will never replace: lived experience. It can’t feel grief or joy or nostalgia.
It doesn’t remember what a childhood home smelled like or what it felt like to fall in love for the first time.
It doesn’t understand cultural nuance, historical pain, or generational stories passed down at kitchen tables.
Only humans bring that to the canvas.
That’s why I see AI not as a rival but as an extension of my own creativity. It handles repetition, suggests directions, gives me a visual push—but the decisions, the emotions, and the meanings still come from me.
And that, to me, is where the magic lives.
‍
Looking forward, I can’t help but feel excited. AI is already evolving to understand tone, style, and emotion more deeply.
Some tools are learning my preferences over time, suggesting color palettes or layouts based on my past work. Others let me collaborate in real time, adjusting visuals while I refine ideas.
But what I’m really looking forward to is the shift in mindset. We’re moving into an era where AI isn’t just a novelty—it’s part of the creative toolkit. And the more artists learn how to use it responsibly, the more we’ll unlock its full potential.
I think future creatives will look back on this moment the way we look at the invention of photography or the rise of digital design. It’s not the end of anything. It’s the beginning of something new.
If you’re a creative and you’ve been skeptical about AI—trust me, I get it. I was too.
But the moment I started treating it like a partner instead of a threat, everything changed.
You don’t have to give up traditional techniques. You don’t have to compromise your voice.
What you can do is explore. Experiment. Play. Use these tools to expand your range, spark new ideas, and maybe see your own creativity from a different angle.
AI isn’t here to define your art. It’s here to challenge you—to help you see what else you might be capable of.
And that, in itself, is a creative journey worth taking.